Skip to main content

People Still Expect the Facts From Communicators


As a PR professional who regularly creates content for clients and for personal use, I follow the National Press Photographers Association (NPPA) Code of Ethics offers nine ethical standards to member journalists. I also require my team to follow the NPPA Code of Ethics and teach them in the classroom. The basic premises of the NPPA's nine standards are (NPPA, November 2017): 

1. Accurately represent subjects 
2. Do not be manipulated by staged photos 
3. Avoid bias and stereotyping in work; provide complete information and context 
4. Show consideration for subjects 
5. Avoid influencing the actions of the photographic subject 6. Editing should not give the wrong impression of the subjects in the photograph 
7. Do not compensate persons involved in photographs or in getting a photograph 
8. Do not accept gifts or other favors from those involved in a photo 
9. Do not purposely interfere with the work of other journalists 


The last two (8&9) are not common in terms of issues for PR professionals, but one through seven absolutely are. Accurately representing subjects, not staging photos and not showing bias/stereotyping are non-negotiables. PR professionals should always be truthful and thorough in the depiction of subjects. 

Letting yourself be manipulated by manufactured picture opportunities is not a good idea. This can (and will) cause a credibility and reputation issue for the brand you are representing. When photographing or recording subjects, be thorough and provide context. Individuals and groups should not be stereotyped. Sometimes brands are desperate to show that they are dedicated to diversity, so they attempt to fill their photos with non-causation subjects. 

I’ve been asked to stage photos with people of color at employee events—meaning these people don’t even work for the company. I have refused and even fired a major client after repeated efforts to pretend that they were a diverse company, even using stock photography because they (in reality) had little to no diversity. I’ve also called a client out for using the one person of color who works at the company in every photo. Obviously, staging diversity for photo content is a major hot bottom for me and where I draw the line. I find it offensive and a reason to part with a client. 

Sources: 
Code of ethics. NPPA. (2017, November 28). Retrieved April 29, 2022, from https://nppa.org/code-ethics Hoover, A. (n.d.). Photojournalism ethics. LoveToKnow. Retrieved April 29, 2022, from https://photography.lovetoknow.com/Photojournalism_Ethics

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Facebook Changes the Newsroom Forever

Facebook has evolved and significantly changed the way news organizations communicate. For all intensive purposes, social media (starting with Facebook) in general has turned the media industry upside down. For example, back in 2004, users could only interact with textual posts. Users can now submit photographs, movies, live material, virtual reality, and 360-degree videos, among other things (Pires Luciano, October 2019).  Phones and cameras allow everyone to be a reporter and social media platforms give everyone a venue to share. For the last 15 years, news organizations have been forced to embrace the use of online news platforms. More than eight-in-ten U.S. adults (86%) say they get news from a smartphone, computer, or tablet “often” or “sometimes,” including 60% who say they do so often (Shearer, January 2021). Traditional news organizations have had no choice but to adopt and embrace social media, with the push first coming from Facebook back in the early 2000s primarily because

Technology Challenges Ethics & Integrity of Communication Professionals

The integration of technology has had a profound impact on professionals who work in the communications field, especially as it relates to ethics and communication of the facts in general. As someone who has worked in the PR and marketing field for 25+, I’ve experienced the transition to technology throughout my career.  As an undergraduate student back in the late 80’s, there was no discussion of technology in our journalism and PR coursework. The internet was not widely available, our work was created on typewriters, and we learned to use the old-fashion reporting and content creation techniques using the phone and in-person interaction. Reporting and gathering the facts and information, in general, was guided by the truth and the ethical gathering of the truth.  Gathering information for news stories was usually methodical and reputable reporters were careful to report the facts. A good example is the Watergate story. Woodward and Bernstein worked diligently to ensure to report th

Annotated Bibilography